How Trustliant compares
The DMARC pure-plays are good products — we compete on the MSP operating model, not on rubbishing them. Detailed, sourced comparisons per vendor are coming; here's the shape of the difference.
| Dimension | Trustliant | Typical alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Published MSP pricing | on the website | behind a sales call |
| Multi-tenant model | Customers → domains, role-scoped | Mostly flat domain lists |
| White-label depth | App shell + portal + reports | Usually reports only (if at all) |
| Remediation workflow | Assignable findings with exact fixes & auto-resolve on rescan | Dashboards; the workflow lives in your PSA (manually) |
| Explainable scoring | Every component scored & explained | Pass/fail checkmarks or opaque grades |
| DMARCbis (RFC 9989) | Parser is bis-aware today | Varies; mostly RFC 7489-era |
Per-vendor pages (vs EasyDMARC, PowerDMARC, Valimail, dmarcian, Proofpoint, Mimecast) publish with early access — each with sourced feature and pricing claims, dated.